16 Comments

Ah, well. Here’s the thing. My initial response to AI writing was “hell to the no!” But now, I’m not so sure. At the moment, we have a multitude of “content creators” producing a mountain of what amounts to the same thing. They don’t have an original thought in their heads. They copy other people’s article ideas and outright plagiarize. Cooking blogs are a great example. Every New York Times recipe with legs has been redone ad infinitum. I once googled “10 job interview tips” and got over 2 billion nearly identical hits. So let the real robots write the stuff people are just phoning in anyway. Talented writers who can produce what the computer can’t may suddenly be in demand. Maybe we can in turn demand higher pay. We can dream, right?

Expand full comment

I want nothing to do with ChatGPT or anything related to it. Authorship should always be treated as a venture done entirely or primarily by human beings, and Amazon needs to tighten its belt on allowing machine-made materials to be distributed. Some fiction magazines I know of are reevaluating their submission processes to deal with this, so it's not like there's no precedent.

Expand full comment

The world keeps on turning…..new methods, ideas are going to continue unfolding daily…..just do what you are passion about and do it well… and don’t worry or focus on what others are doing or trying to do….and All will be well☑️☑️ Stay Blessed

Expand full comment

It’s a super slippery slope. Soon, school kids will be handing in AI written papers, and it will be continued into college. Why learn stuff on your own when a computer can do it for you?

We’re already a culture who seems to not want to think for ourselves. This makes it even easier. Why create art or write a book in your own? (That was rhetorical. ) Many jobs have been taken away by computers, venturing into the arts feels similar.

All that said, it’s human emotion and passion that make the best art. It’s tough to sell books on Amazon. I know firsthand. I even worked on building an audience first. It’s not easy to attract kids or their busy parents to online books. I can’t imagine it will be any easier for the ChatGPT books to attract an audience, other than some may sell as novelties of new technology.

Wow. I just unloaded there. Guess I have some strong feelings about this that I had not given much thought to.

Thanks for making me think. On my own. 😀

Expand full comment

ChatGPT is to writers as are the Asian "knock-off" producers of brand name products for very cheap prices. Even in the 18th century, first performances of work by famous composers were attended by transcriptionists that would copy down the music, note for note, and have sheet music for sale within a few days. As humans we have to deal with parasites like other animals, but our parasites are all too often our fellow humans. I suspect that in these early days the overall mood of the public will be one of awe at how far AI has come. Once the first dangerously bad medical texts appear, the first rapid weight loss diets leading to death, or other things that AI will almost certainly get tragically wrong, will the cry go out for something to be done. As a software developer, I believe that hacks will be developed to trick AI content scrapers into collecting content that is deliberately made worthless. For example, sprinkle nonsense in white text with a white background in an article. Humans won't see it, but AI will, at least until it has been modified to ignore it. The community of writers would do well to share information about their work that has been plagiarized, by whom, and where. Anything that will reduce the profit from theft will help.

Expand full comment

“It’s pretty easy to bash Amazon on that one.“ It sure is.

Holly’s comments are spot on

Expand full comment

Another reason such books might sell better as children's books is that marketing for children's books is a little different, since the person who pays for the book is often different from the person who reads the book. Many people who are looking for gifts will purchase a children's book which looks cool without thinking too much about the quality of the writing.

Setting aside the issues around AIs training on copyrighted works, I'm okay with ChatGPT books existing and being sold as long as they are marked as such, and in some cases (such as technical manuals) I can imagine them being a net benefit. (Those technical manuals would still need to be checked by humans, but machine learning might make the process easier).

Expand full comment

I wonder how ChatGPT would respond to asking why users should/should not be allowed to publish ChatGPT generated books under their own names. Also, is it fair for those books to compete against human authors, possibly taking away writing jobs?

Another article!?😀

Expand full comment

I don't see ChatGPT as an existential crisis for writers interested in quality. Going froward, writers will be paid more to think while AI handles the "doing" (basic research, drumming up headlines, etc.). I heard Chat GPT compared to an intern recently, and I think that's an apt comparison...for now, anyway.

Now if you're someone cranking out boilerplate hotel reviews for .01/word, you might be in trouble. But that's another story.

As an editor on Medium, I haven't seen it creep into the submission queue a whole lot. I'm sure part of that is down to the stable of writers at my pub. Most of them are old school, like the idea of chiseling away at a heartfelt piece until it's ready. My guess is the "well lit" pub is welcoming AI generated stories with open arms. I don't see the good dr. putting up any guardrails, but am happy to be corrected.

Expand full comment
deletedFeb 24, 2023Liked by Linda Caroll
Comment deleted
Expand full comment