Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nancy E. Holroyd, RN's avatar

Well, darn...I've been doing tags that make sense for the piece I'm writing, not the limited Substack "tags".

At least, I learned something new! Thanks.

Expand full comment
Rebecca Rocket's avatar

So glad I came to read your latest piece because it ties directly to my comment on the one Substack showed me first. My day job is in technology, and we are relying more and more on AI to do simple tasks (and to your point, articles on Kim Kardashian may not necessarily require a human touch. AI is prob okay for those ones. Bad news for journalists.) But when I think of what needs to be done in *creative* writing -- we're in a bit of a "garbage" situation. The AI requires our content to generate thoughtful, human-like responses. But it will always fail at the type of innovation that say Shakespeare was capable of... because it can't make the decision to turn a noun to a verb etc. Writers are still responsible for that. And while we're feeding and training the machine as we continue to write.... those "unique word usements" (to quote Steve Martin in LA Story) are left to the wayside until they become commonplace, because the algorithms will not recognize them as (what is -- to me -- Chat GPT's favorite word) resonant.

It's a strange time.

Really enjoying your pieces.

Expand full comment
133 more comments...

No posts